Previous Page  148 / 156 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 148 / 156 Next Page
Page Background

146

et al.

2010). Despite this, there have been no primary

prosecutions and only one secondary prosecution for

non-compliance with the regulations.

c. Birds such as gamebirds and wildfowl ingest spent lead

gunshot mistakenly for food or the grit that helps them

to grind up food in their muscular gizzards. Ingestion of

lead gunshot by waterfowl is associated with increased

death rates (Tavecchia

et al.

2001). Large numbers of

birds of these kinds suffer and die annually in Europe

because of poisoning due to ingested ammunition-

derived lead (Mateo 2009).

d. Lead-based gunshot and bullets used to shoot wildlife

can fragment into numerous small pieces within the

animal, some of which may be distant from the wound

tract; many of these are sufficiently small to be easily

ingested by scavenging animals or incorporated into

meat prepared for human consumption (Hunt

et al.

2009; Grund

et al.

2010; Knott

et al.

2010; Pain

et al.

2010).

e. Although the effects of ingestion of spent lead

ammunition are best documented for waterfowl, they

have also been reported for more than 60 bird species

from other taxonomic groups (Pain

et al.

2009). Lead

poisoning from the ingestion of spent lead-based

ammunition fragments in carrion and prey animals

is a significant source of poisoning and mortality in

predatory and scavenging birds of prey, including

European vultures (Donázar

et al.

2002; Mateo 2009) and

the white-tailed eagle

Haliaeetus albicilla

, in parts of the

EU (Pain

et al.

1993, 1997; Fisher

et al.

2006; Nadjafzadeh

et al.

2013).

f.

Lead-based ammunition is a significant source of lead

exposure in humans that ingest wild game (Hanning

et al.

2003; Johansen

et al.

2006; Tsuji

et al.

2008), and

blood lead levels in people consuming game meat

shot with lead-based ammunition have been shown

to be elevated in European countries and elsewhere,

in proportion to the amounts and frequency of game

consumed (Dewailly

et al.

2001; Iqbal 2009; Meltzer

et al.

2013; Bjermo

et al.

2013).

g. High concentrations of ammunition-derived lead are

often found in edible tissues of both small and large

game animals shot with lead ammunition and can

be present in tissues at a considerable distance from

obvious wounding so that they are difficult to remove

during food preparation (Pain

et al.

2010; FSA 2012a).

Meat from game animals contaminated in this way is

consumed by people associated with shooting and,

in some countries (such as in the UK), is also sold in

supermarkets and other food outlets to consumers who

are largely unaware of associated risks.

h. Several EU countries have produced advice on the

risks to human health of frequent consumption of

game meat shot with lead ammunition, particularly to

young children, pregnant women or women wishing to

become pregnant (BfR 2011; AESAN 2012; FSA 2012b;

VKM 2013).

4. Non-toxic alternatives to lead ammunition have been

developed, are widely available, and perform well (Thomas

2013). The sport of shooting and its associated trade in

ammunition and other supplies appears to remain viable

in countries where the use of lead shot in ammunition

has already been banned (

e.g.

within Europe, lead shot in

ammunition has been banned for all shooting since 1993 in

the Netherlands, since 1996 in Denmark and since 2005 in

Norway).

Based upon (1) overwhelming evidence for the toxic effects of

lead in humans and wildlife, even at very low exposure levels, (2)

convincing data that the discharge of lead-based ammunition

into the environment poses significant risks of lead exposure

to humans and wildlife, and (3) the availability and suitability of

several non-lead alternative products for hunting, we support

a phase out and eventual elimination of the use of lead-based

ammunition and its replacement with non-toxic alternatives.

Signed,

Dr Aksel Bernhoft,

Senior Researcher, Norwegian Veterinary

Institute, Department of Health Surveillance, Postbox 750

Sentrum, NO-0106 Oslo, Norway

Professor Alan R. Boobis OBE PhD FSB FBTS,

Professor of

Biochemical Pharmacology & Director of Public Health England

Toxicology Unit, Centre for Pharmacology & Therapeutics,

Division of Experimental Medicine, Department of Medicine,

Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, Ducane Road,

LondonW12 0NN, UK

Appendix 2